I’m not quite sure how it happened, but somewhere along the
way people began seeking me out as a mentor.
They ask me for career advice. Me?
All the time!
I’m not being falsely modest when I say I don’t really know
why. My own career was built on a
foundation of poorly researched choices, chutzpah, and desperation. If not for a few instances of tremendous serendipity,
I’d be living in the basement of my sister’s house and hoping to score an ACT tutoring
gig at a store front in a strip mall.
Seriously. I got my
first teaching job totally by accident. The
names of most of Chicago’s suburbs are compounds of a limited number of natural
phenomena. There’s Forest Park , just west of the
city, and Park Forest to the south; Lake Forest on the north shore and Lake Park
to the southwest. As a city dweller who didn’t drive, I had neither reason nor
interest in learning these nuances, so I confused the names of a prestigious
north suburban school district with a slightly less glamorous one to the west. Glenbrook’s loss was Glenbard’s gain. And mine.
But I digress.
I work with a lot of young teachers, and, I suppose because
my terminal degree is in educational administration and policy, they often ask
me for advice about becoming administrators.
First, I explain that I have little interest in either administration or
policy. My degree is a function of the department
that employed the person who was chairing my dissertation committee—another poorly
researched choice that eventually worked itself out—and that my interests lie
in teacher quality and efficacy.
This rarely discourages anyone from continuing to solicit my
opinion. So here’s what I tell
them.
Wait five years.
Most of you probably think that I’m alluding to the folk
wisdom that it takes five years to become a teacher, that, if expertise is in
large part a product of experience, five years is the minimum amount of
experience needed to quality as an expert.
That’s not why I tell them to wait.
A good administrator has to have lived through at least one
cycle of state and national elections. You have to experience firsthand overhauling
your curriculum in an effort to comply with one administration’s policy only to
be asked by another to dismantle and rebuild it four years later. You need to feel the heartbreak that occurs
when, after buying into a paradigm shift and working for two years to
transition your practice to meet it, you are betrayed by the same people who
pitched it to you in the first place.
Sometime in the late 1990s, the state of Illinois adopted a
new certification process. Teachers had
five years to assemble evidence of their continued professional learning. Hard copies of this evidence—transcripts,
certificates, programmes, etc.—would then be submitted to the Illinois State
Board of Education where, presumably, someone’s job would be to verify that
every certified teacher in Illinois had attained the necessary number of
credits.
There are approximately 130,00 teachers in Illinois. If each of them submitted only five
artifacts, the ISBE headquarters would collapse under the weight of nearly ¾ of
a million documents. Well, that’s what I
was counting on anyway.
For many of my younger colleagues (and, sadly, some of the
older ones), this process was a source of tremendous anxiety. I overheard more than a few panicked phone
calls attempting to track down a certificate of attendance for a conference they’d
attended six months earlier.
I collected nothing—just waited. I’d been around long enough to know this wasn’t
going to happen.
And it didn’t. When the first few portfolios starting
arriving in Springfield, those tasked with implementing the policy suddenly
realized that lacked the time, the manpower, and the will to do so.
I don’t know what replaced it. Presumably something equally superficial but
less bulky.
One of the most important jobs a principal must do is to
serve as a buffer between her faculty members and the continuous barrage of stupidity
bombarding them. A principal may not be
able to excuse teachers from external mandates, but he can help them discriminate
between tasks worth doing well and those worth doing well enough. Great principals
encourage their people to put their time and energies into executing policies
that are meaningful and stand a chance of sticking around.
The other stuff they let them half-ass.
But until you’ve been in the classroom at
least five years, it can be hard to tell the difference.